If we Wish to Know

Profound inferences about the existence evolve from a blank canvas. There are a lot of ambiguities when the mind vacillates between the strongly defined phases in life, the ‘known’ and ‘unknown’.

When the ‘known’ or existing knowledge interferes with the unbiased progress towards the so-called ‘unknown’, we shall come up with explanations that best seems logical to our mind, which is under duress to come up with some explanation.

Based on a pre-defined premise of argument you can only reach that far and not what lies beyond. Our mind misses the crucial signs and clues from the universe because we have already anticipated the type of ‘unknown’.

We have to widen the scope of our deduction as we are dealing with something which is eternal (as we define it) or the vast spaces which are yet to be explored.

We are too occupied with what we know and get into an argument trying to prove each other wrong, instead of diligently focusing on the blank canvas long enough. The answers and possibilities, even the pure ideas will be birthed from such a state.

The unknown (as we believe) is a reflection of our incomplete knowledge and a strong projection of the mind that is confused with many suggestions and arguments.

Let go of the theories and hypotheses and do not allow the mind to travel through a confined tunnel, hoping to discover light. We are bound and limited by the concept of Time and wish to arrive at a pre-determined destination which we define as ‘unknown.

When the mind is free and we negate the existing realities, or as our half-awakened senses have perceived existence for us till now, we will be able to transcend the make-belief world and arrive at a much authentic and pure knowledge about the exactness of this vast space.

Yes, such philosophies may seem preposterous, but there are more possibilities out there than to be bound by the limitations and not try to explore. The mind works better when it is free from prejudices.